military pictures to color,military pictures to color for kids,military images free
Libyan air strikes destroyed the opposition in the West Gaddafi armored vehicles and took pictures to celebrate the wreckage.Libya is now time to hit the war have a long way, and the warming seem fresh anymore.TV war is basically the first 24 hours of continuous live now can not see the situation, the newspaper headlines is not the Libyan war, and more media have been the focus and attention to other directions, including the military the concern of fans has also been moved from other parts of Libya.
Libyan war situation, or will enter the final stage showdown
In fact, the situation of the war against Libya in all the process of gradually fade, the war situation in Libya is likely to enter the final showdown of the period.
These days we can see a series of movements. The first attack a few days ago the Americans sent a mission UAV air strikes in Libya. Subsequently, on April 25 morning NATO air strikes Aziz Zia barracks, causing dozens of casualties. We know that Aziz Zia camp is Gaddafi's residence, so this action is Muammar Gaddafi was accused of assassination.
Then, 25, Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi said the Italian Air Force will participate in the NATO air strikes. After this, April 26, Obama endorsed the opposition to Libya to provide $ 25,000,000 of non-weapons aid projects.
The same day, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin during his visit Copenhagen, the the military action against Gaddafi called "crusade." To the 27, Libya 61 tribal leaders jointly called for Gaddafi to step down.
In particular, there is a trend to note is the April 26, British Defense Secretary Fox, chief of defense staff Richards to Washington, met with U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen, the meeting mainly discussion is the question on the war situation in Libya.
If the classification for these trends, you will find that there are several layers of meaning.
The first implication is that Americans in the war which has already begun raising the stakes gambling, and attack drones to participate in air strikes, including sending, to provide assistance to the opposition attacked the barracks Aziz Zia, the talks also included and the British.
The second implication is that the person next to follow the trend has begun in the more of them into the war, the most typical of Italy's participation in air strikes this action.
The third is the Libyan national also began there have been some subtle changes. In fact, the beginning of the war from Libya, NATO, the United States has been doing work on the Libyan interior, and now the results of this work has begun to show up, and 61 tribal leaders began to call for Gaddafi to step down.
So, how to understand the targets to Gadhafi as so-called "decapitation operations" it?There are two meanings, one is really want to kill Gaddafi, that some people say the Western core of the problem at the Gaddafi of Libya who solve this problem then the most straightforward approach is to "snakeheads" cut down .
Another layer of meaning can not be ruled out, is to use this way to transmit information Gaddafi, to continue to pressure you wondering how to do it yourself.
Public disclosure of such information is certainly not open some things under the table.So, these things under the table, what is?
First of all, the talks are not talks between the leaders, not the U.S. President and British Prime Minister's talks, but the central figure in the talks, the two armies.
The central figure in the talks that the army what? First of all, the political and diplomatic level, the two should have been agreed, that the U.S. president and British prime minister should already have a consensus on the political and diplomatic and objective.
This time, the two military leaders talk around this objective, which we can use military means, how to use these military means, it means how to fight the problem.
Therefore, the Anglo-American cooperation in this area into a concrete action has been the level of the.
These may include any military action? Why America and Britain talk about it? Since the military leaders of the two countries to talk about, that I'm sure there are some military action beyond the scope of things now.
Before this is mainly because of air raids and air strikes alone Gaddafi also defeated, since the defeated, how to do the following?
This is the core of the ground staff which is not to enter? Our previous information from the point of view, is the first British special forces have been infiltrated into the disclosure of the territory of Libya. Now the U.S. and UK talk, will re-address this issue?
U.S. troops out of people is not easy, because the president promised before not to send ground troops, it now needs to help the British. Since the Anglo-American is the "iron man", could you help with one?
Of course, from the current situation, I am afraid that no one could say a large number of ground troops sent into Libya, but the Special Forces, military advisers and even the form of peacekeeping force to enter Libya, this possibility can not be ruled out.
So why is the United States and Britain talk about? We have an old saying that goes "soldiers into battle and his son, Tiger brothers" really a critical time, Americans will still find the old partner, as the French pioneer is the first in front of. When the United States at the end I'm afraid will find the UK rather than France, to share with this card.
Because the final showdown time and the results of the following sub-plate is a direct link. Therefore, the United States and Britain talk about military leaders is to show that the United States and Britain will be in the military will have a new, big action.
The United States to make up their minds
The talks include the results of the talks, it seems that the U.S. has to make up their minds. Why?
First, it is consumed war can not afford so crushed. Playing for so long, has not reached the end, and the means to continue to use air strikes can achieve their goals is still a question mark.
Second, Americans are afraid to consider the deal with the new change in the situation, and Syria has been a problem in this direction, while Syria's strategic balance in the United States Bilibiya more weight on Syria itself to be more hard-hardness Bilibiya .
Encounter such a major change in the situation the United States can not stand idly by when it must be to disrupt, whether by military means or military means. Can not imagine the U.S. using military action did not do the preparation.
That is, regardless of weapons at every turn, Americans are going to use force to do. In this case, Libya is also to make a statement of the time it?
No comments:
Post a Comment